Subscribe in a reader
Subscribe by Email
According to our database records, Jim Cramer has owned Halliburton Company (HAL) for his charitable trust throughout the length of this graph. Although he has been consistent in his endorsement of the stock, its performance since October 2005 is below market averages. While oil prices have increased over the past few years, the price of natural gas has fallen after the highs it made after the hurricane Katrina disaster, dragging Halliburton down with it. Recently though, with natural gas prices rising in 2007, Halliburton has regained its mojo, heading back to pre-split levels.
5 comments:
Anyone that would consider investing in a company that rapes their employees (http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4099514) and grossly overcharges taxpayers (http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/12/12/politics/main588216.shtml) is just as fucked up as the company themselves. And that's just the stuff we know about. How about being FRUSTRATED over that?
I'm here to make money, not ethical judgments about the companies I invest in. In addition, I think you would be hard pressed to find a single company in today's business world that does not partake in some "iffy" business practices. It is a dog eat dog world.
It's not like the company as a whole "raped" any of their employees. I'm sure if you look at any company, even our own government, you will find someone convicted of a sex crime. Does that mean the company did it? That's a pretty large generalization...
we should just talk about the quality or direction of the stock, and not be aging hippie liberal douches. Do you guys feel this stock is legit, regardless of what Cramer says, it has not performed that well in many areas.
Thank you, I have recently been searching for information about this topic for ages and yours is the best I have discovered so far.
Post a Comment